
The great physicist was not the first to equate forms of mass to energy, nor did he definitively prove the relationshipbr/
br/
— Read more on ScientificAmerican.comdiv class=»feedflare»
a href=»http://rss.sciam.com/~ff/sciam/physics?a=53FshDgbf14:OixDQG_ypVs:yIl2AUoC8zA»img src=»http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/sciam/physics?d=yIl2AUoC8zA» border=»0″/img/a a href=»http://rss.sciam.com/~ff/sciam/physics?a=53FshDgbf14:OixDQG_ypVs:qj6IDK7rITs»img src=»http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/sciam/physics?d=qj6IDK7rITs» border=»0″/img/a a href=»http://rss.sciam.com/~ff/sciam/physics?a=53FshDgbf14:OixDQG_ypVs:l6gmwiTKsz0″img src=»http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/sciam/physics?d=l6gmwiTKsz0″ border=»0″/img/a a href=»http://rss.sciam.com/~ff/sciam/physics?a=53FshDgbf14:OixDQG_ypVs:gIN9vFwOqvQ»img src=»http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/sciam/physics?i=53FshDgbf14:OixDQG_ypVs:gIN9vFwOqvQ» border=»0″/img/a a href=»http://rss.sciam.com/~ff/sciam/physics?a=53FshDgbf14:OixDQG_ypVs:QXVau8BzmBE»img src=»http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/sciam/physics?d=QXVau8BzmBE» border=»0″/img/a a href=»http://rss.sciam.com/~ff/sciam/physics?a=53FshDgbf14:OixDQG_ypVs:ZC7T4KBF6Nw»img src=»http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/sciam/physics?d=ZC7T4KBF6Nw» border=»0″/img/a a href=»http://rss.sciam.com/~ff/sciam/physics?a=53FshDgbf14:OixDQG_ypVs:I9og5sOYxJI»img src=»http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/sciam/physics?d=I9og5sOYxJI» border=»0″/img/a
/divimg src=»http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciam/physics/~4/53FshDgbf14″ height=»1″ width=»1″ alt=»»/
http://rss.sciam.com/~r/sciam/physics/~3/53FshDgbf14/