9 julio 2015
Scientific journals should insist on more robust experimental processes, say biologists after reviewing nearly 900,000 experiments. The team found that non-blind experiments — that is, where scientists knew which samples they were recording — averaged a 27 percent stronger result than blind trials. However, their review suggests that less than one in four experiments used blind data recording.
http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/~3/rDn6XJGysZw/150709092729.htm
