12 June 2015
Peer reviews in science, in which independent scientists who are experts on the subject assess the paper, is the current strategy for ensuring quality and control in scientific research and, therefore, it is essential for the academic world. However, a new study uncovers why this system frequently receives harsh criticism about its effectiveness and transparency, and she proposes alternatives to improve it.
http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/~3/BqkCEe1qhzw/150612103805.htm
